Prediction of Kimberly Birrell [62nd] vs Su Jeong Jang [257th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W L L W
Form
L L W L W L L W L LHead To Head: Birrell 3 - 0 Jang
They have played 8 sets in total, with Birrell winning 6 and Jang winning 2. The last match between Birrell and Jang was at the W75 Brisbane, 06-02-2025, Second, Hard with Kimberly Birrell getting the victory 7-6(1) 7-6(1).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kimberly Birrell | 3 |
| Su Jeong Jang | 0 |
| Birrell | Stats | Jang |
|---|---|---|
| 75% (21-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (3-6) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 62 | Ranking | 257 |
| 61 | Highest Rank | 114 |
| 26 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 13 |
| 56% (242-194) | Career Total W/L | 59% (435-299) |
| $891,948 | Career Prize Money | $355,985 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 7-6(1) |
Stats 
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Su Jeong Jang
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
76%
(
66 of
87)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-2 6-7(7) 6-4 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Su Jeong Jang
71%
(
77 of
108)
1st Serve %
85%
(
101 of
119)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
119)
118
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
| 6-3 1-6 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 45 | Games Won | 38 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:2:42 | Average Match Time | 2:2:42 |
| 68% (132/194) | 1st Serve % | 81% (167/206) |
| 64% (84/132) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (94/167) |
| 52% (32/62) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (16/39) |
| 42% (10/24) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (7/17) |
| 47% (96/206) | Return Points Win % | 40% (78/194) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kimberly Birrell vs Su Jeong Jang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Birrell 3 - 0 Jang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Birrell has won 45.32% of points on their second serve, while Jang has won 41.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Birrell, in recent form, has won 48.07% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jang has won 48.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.22% and 32.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Birrell has saved 48.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jang has saved 43.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Birrell has won 68.54% of matches played (W/L 61/ 28), with Jang winning 53.06% (W/L 26/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Birrell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 180/ 129), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11). Jang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 77/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Birrell has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 25/ 10), where as Jang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 22/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Birrell winning 3 times and Jang being victorious 0 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Birrell winning 6 and Jang winning 2. The last match between Birrell and Jang was at the W75 Brisbane, 06-02-2025, Second, Hard with Kimberly Birrell getting the victory 7-6(1) 7-6(1).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Birrell and Jang have played a deciding set 2 times, with Birrell winning 2 times and Jang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Birrell winning 2, and Jang 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Birrell has played against opponents with an average rank of 206.33 while Jang has played against players with an average rank of 288.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Birrell has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jang has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Birrell has converted 39.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jang has converted 40.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Kimberly Birrell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Yuliana Lizarazo
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
122%
(
56 of
46)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Kimberly Birrell
113%
(
81 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Kimberly Birrell
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Anastasia Potapova
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
52 of
100)
3
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
2
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Harriet Dart
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Kimberly Birrell
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Viktorija Golubic
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Cristina Bucsa
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Kristina Penickova
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Su Jeong Jang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Su Jeong Jang
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zongyu Li
Player
Su Jeong Jang
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve %
33%
(
2 of
6)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
50%
(
1 of
2)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
5
Total Points Won
3
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Hanyu Guo
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Su Jeong Jang
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
18 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Su Jeong Jang
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
76%
(
66 of
87)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(1) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
2-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Xinxin Yao
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
49%
(
41 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hong Yi Cody Wong
Player
Su Jeong Jang
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 3-6 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Su Jeong Jang
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Birrell vs Jang?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Birrell Vs Jang is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (242/194) | Win/Loss | 59% (435/299) |
| 54% (554/474) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (969/723) |
| 52% (4993/4672) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (8248/7157) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 738 | Aces Total | 607 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1567 | Total Double Faults | 1437 |
| 1:35:52 | Average Match Time | 1:12:45 |
| 232.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 247.62 |
| 63% (17165/27195) | 1st Serve % | 69% (22102/31968) |
| 63% (10894/17165) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (13477/22102) |
| 45% (4555/10033) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4408/9866) |
| 46% (1562/3422) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2086/4297) |
| 45% (12512/27868) | Return Points Win % | 47% (15456/32939) |
| 55% (238/430) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (431/728) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 49% (57/117) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (70/129) |
| 54% (85/156) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (123/224) |
| 86% (227/195) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (404/357) |
| 14% (227/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (404/47) |
| 22% (209/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (330/77) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
